Where this comes from

News, court and public records

Every press-reported or court item on this site traces back to a source on this page. Read the originals, check the dates, and confirm the current position on the official portals.

Last updated 14 October 2026 Source IDs match the dossier and project pages
Timeline

The public record, in date order

Searches and investigations are not convictions. The company’s stated position is included where it exists.

4 January 2024 · Income-Tax Department

Income-Tax searches on Noida developers

PTI reported searches on several Noida real-estate groups, including Bhutani Infra, Group 108 and Logix, at 37 premises in Noida, Delhi and Faridabad. The companies had not commented at the time of the report.

Press-reported

SourcePTI via Business Standard · SRC-02, SRC-07

September 2024 · Goa

Sancoale panchayat to issue notice over approvals

Reports said the Sancoale village panchayat would issue a notice to Bhutani Infra’s Goa project over approvals, amid political criticism of the project.

Press-reported

SourcesConstruction World · Deccan Herald · SRC-15

February 2025 · Goa

Local protests over the Sancoale project

Residents of Sancoale protested a large residential project in a water-stressed area, according to Land Conflict Watch.

Press-reported

SourceLand Conflict Watch · SRC-11

27 February 2025 · Enforcement Directorate

ED searches across Delhi-NCR and Lucknow

The ED was reported to have searched premises linked to WTC Group and Bhutani Group. Reports said about ₹500 crore of transactions were examined at the Lucknow office (not officially confirmed by the ED), and recapped the January 2024 Income-Tax searches, in which about ₹1,500 crore in unaccounted cash was said to have been found across four Noida builder groups.

Pending Press-reported

SourcesIANS via The Hans India · Investing.com · Moneylife · SRC-01, SRC-03, SRC-06

1 March 2025 · Company statement

Bhutani Group’s stated position

Bhutani Group said it was cooperating with the ED’s inquiry and that it has no connection with WTC Group.
Press-reported

SourceBusiness Standard · SRC-09

September 2025 · Goa

High Court challenge on environmental clearance and hill-cutting

Goa Bachao Abhiyan was reported to have challenged permissions for the Sancoale project in the Bombay High Court at Goa, on environmental clearance, floor-area and hill-cutting grounds.

Press-reported

SourceHerald Goa · SRC-12

October 2025 · Noida

Alphathum floor-count dispute

Local outlets reported that buyers allege towers at the Sector 90 project have about 29 floors against an approval for 26, and that an FIR was registered. The developer was reported to say the revised plans were approved.

Press-reported

SourcesThe Fortune Realty Group · Bharat Speaks · SRC-10 · Low-authority local sources; we are seeking a primary record.

15 November 2025 · Bombay High Court at Goa

Public-interest petition dismissed

The High Court was reported to have dismissed a public-interest petition (filed by Peter D’Souza and four others) against permissions for the developer’s Sancoale project.

Press-reported

SourceThe Goan · SRC-13

20 February 2026 · Supreme Court

No forced possession without an Occupancy Certificate

In Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Mohit Khirbat (2026 INSC 170), decided under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the Court held a developer cannot force a buyer to take possession without an OC. A general precedent — it does not concern any project on this site.

Court finding

SourcesJudgment (PDF) · The Tribune — coverage · SRC-20

2 September 2026 · Supreme Court

Notice issued on a challenge to the Sancoale “Acqua Eden” ruling

The Supreme Court agreed to hear Goa Bachao Abhiyan’s petition against a Bombay High Court ruling on the “Acqua Eden” project in Sancoale and issued notice to the Goa government and the developer, named in the report as Parmesh Constructions Company Ltd. The petitioners seek a stay; the report does not say one was granted. The matter is pending.

Pending

SourcesThe CSR Journal · Devdiscourse · SRC-14

Source register

Every source, with an ID and a strength note

IDs are referenced on the dossier and project pages. “Strength” is our view of the source type, not of the truth of the claim.

  1. SRC-01

    About ₹1,500 crore of unaccounted cash reportedly found across four Noida builder groups in the January 2024 Income-Tax searches (recap, Feb 2025).

  2. SRC-02

    37 premises searched in the January 2024 Income-Tax operation.

  3. SRC-03

    About ₹500 crore of transactions reportedly examined at the Lucknow office (Feb 2025); not officially confirmed by the ED.

  4. SRC-06

    ED searches on WTC Group and Bhutani Group across Delhi-NCR (Feb 2025).

  5. SRC-07

    Income-Tax searches on Bhutani Infra, Group 108, Logix and others (4 Jan 2024).

  6. SRC-09

    Bhutani Group’s stated position: cooperating with the ED; no connection with WTC Group (1 Mar 2025).

  7. SRC-10

    Alphathum floor-count dispute and reported FIR; developer says revised plans approved (Oct 2025).

  8. SRC-11

    Sancoale residents protest a large project in a water-stressed area (Feb 2025).

  9. SRC-12

    High Court challenge on environmental clearance, FAR and hill-cutting (Sept 2025).

  10. SRC-13

    Bombay High Court at Goa dismisses a PIL against the Sancoale project (15 Nov 2025).

  11. SRC-14

    Supreme Court issues notice on Goa Bachao Abhiyan’s petition about the “Acqua Eden” project, Sancoale (2 Sept 2026). Developer named as Parmesh Constructions Company Ltd.

  12. SRC-15

    Sancoale panchayat notice over approvals and political controversy (Sept 2024).

  13. SRC-16

    Goa RERA registration for Acqua Eden, PRGO03242174 — status to be checked on the portal.

  14. SRC-17

    UP-RERA registration UPRERAPRJ10097 (Alphathum, Phase III) — check the registered promoter name and filings on the portal.

  15. SRC-20

    Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Mohit Khirbat, 2026 INSC 170 (20 Feb 2026) — Consumer Protection Act decision on possession without an OC.

Gaps in the numbering are deliberate: sources we have withdrawn — because they were weak or partisan, or because the claim they supported has been removed — keep their numbers so earlier references stay traceable. See the corrections log.