Bhutani Cyberthum — reported red flags & what to verify
A buyer-awareness record for Bhutani Cyberthum (Sector 140A, Noida). The points below are reported or alleged by buyers — a flagship “hanging mall” promoted without approvals, OC/CC and assured-return concerns, fake/deemed-OC allegations, and claims of the same unit sold to multiple buyers. These are not court findings. Verify each item independently before paying.
High buyer risk Sector 140A, Noida — commercial, “hanging mall”
Reproduced from buyer-awareness records in the site dossier. Risk labels reflect buyer-reported exposure, not a legal determination — verify each item at source before acting.
Cyberthum
Sector 140A, Noida · commercial · “hanging mall”- Marketed as a flagship attraction; buyer records allege it was promoted without the approvals needed to build such a structure.
- Reported absence of OC/CC and promised amenities.
- Assured returns said to be unpaid while charges are imposed and CRM is unresponsive.
- Buyers reportedly pressured to pay 100% against documents alleged to be not legally valid; advised to stop payments and verify independently.
- Food-court units marketed at ~₹29.99 lakh with promised ~₹37,485/month returns.
- Tower reported to have no OC/CC/registry/possession.
- Same units allegedly sold to multiple buyers, with alleged fake lease guarantees.
- An investor reported paying in full (banking channel) in 2022 for 2 units.
- No possession beyond March 2023, and a subsequent ₹25 lakh Income-Tax notice on the deal.
- Non-possession issues reported as outstanding since 2020.
- Approvals / sanctioned plan for the mall structure.
- Full vs partial / deemed OC/CC — via a RERA lawyer.
- BBA, payment trail and registry status.
- Whether your specific unit is sold or registered to anyone else.
Short answers for buyers researching Bhutani Cyberthum. Awareness only — not legal advice.
Buyer records report concerns including a “hanging mall” promoted without the needed approvals, absence of OC/CC and promised amenities, unpaid assured returns, allegations of fake / deemed / partial OC, and claims that the same food-court units were sold to multiple buyers. All are reported / alleged, not established findings.
Buyer records describe pressure to pay 100% against documents alleged to be not legally valid. Before any further payment, have a RERA lawyer verify full-vs-partial / deemed OC/CC, your BBA, the payment trail, registry status, and whether your specific unit is also registered to someone else.
Buyer records report assured returns being unpaid while charges were still imposed, and at least one investor reporting full payment in 2022 with no possession beyond March 2023 — followed by an Income-Tax notice on the deal. Confirm the current status from your own documents and official records.
Each project has its own buyer-awareness page. Compare red-flag patterns and what to verify.
Real Estate Red Flags does not provide legal advice and makes no final finding against any person or company. Items marked “reported” or “alleged” are buyer-record statements; verify current status from official RERA records, authority documents, tax records and court orders before acting.